fredag 5. desember 2025

India’s warm welcome for Putin sends a cold message to Washington

India’s red-carpet reception for Vladimir Putin this week has sent ripples through Washington. The optics were impossible to ignore: As the Russian president openly threatened Europe – warning that Moscow was “ready” should the continent provoke conflict – New Delhi celebrated his visit as proof of strategic autonomy.

From the vantage point of a Trump administration, India’s ability to maintain cordial relations with a power actively undermining Western security is less a diplomatic feat than a strategic problem. It raises a fundamental question: Can India still be America’s indispensable Indo-Pacific pillar when it signals, through action and optics, that Western priorities are secondary?

For two decades, US policy toward India was guided by a blend of pragmatism and optimism. Washington sought a rising India – economically dynamic, militarily capable and strategically positioned to counterbalance China. India’s enduring ties with Russia, long treated as “legacy” issues, were tolerated because the benefits of a cooperative New Delhi appeared to outweigh the costs.

China’s Artificial Island Military Base Upgrades Revealed

China continues to strengthen its control over the hotly contested South China Sea, as recent analysis of satellite imagery appears to show that its artificial island outposts in the region have bolstered their intelligence, electronic warfare and defensive capabilities.

Citing what it describes as "historic rights"—which The Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in 2016 had no legal basis—China asserts sovereignty over most of the maritime features in the South China Sea, overlapping with its neighbors' claims.

As part of its efforts to tighten control over the waters, China maintains a persistent presence of naval and coast guard vessels, supported by reefs that have been expanded into outposts with military infrastructure, including aviation and defensive facilities.

Chinese Students Would Be Blocked From Sensitive US Labs Under New Proposal

Chinese students and researchers could be among those barred from U.S. labs working on sensitive national security topics under a new bill to be introduced later on Thursday.

North Carolina Republican Representative Pat Harrigan will formally present the bill that would block visas for students, researchers and some professionals to stop Chinese, Russian, Iranian, North Korean and Cuban nationals from working in science, technology, engineering mathematics (STEM) roles in the U.S.

Under the bill, citizens from these five countries would be prevented from working in U.S. research labs and in STEM programs propped up by the U.S. government. It is expected it would impact Chinese nationals the most out of the five nations.

Chinese Economist Issues Dire Warning Over Debt Crisis

A top Chinese economist has issued a warning over the risks of overreliance on stimulus for short-term growth, including driving debt to unsustainable levels.The Chinese government was slow to roll out a major stimulus package following the COVID-19 pandemic, as economic growth slowed and consumer demand flagged. Burdened by a real estate crisis and high levels of local government debt, President Xi Jinping emphasized "high-quality development" and selective investment over broad stimulus.

Some analysts argue that the measures that did arrive were too modest to put the world's second-largest economy on surer footing.

Read more

New US National Security Strategy—Three Things It Says About China

China took center stage in U.S. President Donald Trump's newly released national security strategy, which outlines his security priorities for the coming years. Typically issued once per presidential term, the national security strategy shapes policy and resource allocation across the federal government.

This latest strategy arrives at a time of heightened U.S.-China tensions—with disputes over Taiwan and the South China Sea and the global race for artificial intelligence dominance. Its release also comes as Trump seeks to build on his high-profile October 30 meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, where he touted progress toward a deal to end the ongoing trade war.

While the document largely focused on operations in the Western Hemisphere, China was by far the single most referenced country.

War and Peace by Donald Trump

The President of Peace is back. Never mind that Donald Trump is threatening to bomb land targets in Venezuela, recently called Somali immigrants “garbage,” warned some Democrats committed seditious behavior “punishable by death” and his White House is denying allegations of a war crime.

The commander-in-chief turned statesman on Thursday, presiding over the signing of a deal that he said would end “one of the longest running conflicts anywhere in the world” between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo.He proclaimed, “A great day for Africa, a great day for the world.”

But the event was laden with ironies. For starters, vicious fighting is still raging between Rwanda-backed M23 rebels and Congolese soldiers. On top of that, how many peace treaty signings have a warm-up track that includes the song “Live and Let Die,” to which guests were treated before Trump showed up?

Trump lays bare his contempt for Europe in blistering new national security plan

“America Alone” might be the simplest précis of the White House’s new National Security Strategy, an extraordinary document released Friday that starkly lays out the administration’s broad foreign policy priorities.

In a 33-page wall of words and grievances that self-summarizes as “America First,” it manages to reject European allies with a borderline racist swipe, concede the United States must share power with China and search for new allies in the Western Hemisphere, where currently Washington has few. At times, it would be facile enough to be funny, but the stakes are anything but.

“The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over,” the paper declares early on, although it is unclear if this is a statement of past fact, or a new policy. The place sought for the US in this new world is no clearer either: no longer top dog, more snarling at other rising hounds.